Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Photoshopping Ads: Should we or shouldn't we?

Over the years it has become second nature to Art Directors, and Graphic Designers to instantly open Photoshop when dealing with advertising beauty. Photoshop has become a necessary tool and is for the most part very positive and a good use of technology. Photoshop has made the lives of designers and photographers a little easier with its endless options to retouch work and allow flexibility when designing. Everyday people also have the ability to recover old family photos and restore them without going to expensive photo labs.

That being said, Photoshop is a great tool. However, we use such a tool in foolish ways. Retouching human figures to appear perfect for the sake of advertising is the perfect example of a moral double standard. I feel as though our society, our culture, and industries should be taking ownership in regards to this. When did it become ok in our culture to skew images of humans to convey a false reality? In the online article published in March 2013 by The Globe and Mail Susan Krashinsky states “In 2008, researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison found that women who saw images of very thin actresses and models experienced a negative effect on their body image”. In my opinion, we need to keep conscious of these things in order to hold our society as high priority. Instead we seem to be willing to deceive each other for financial gain.

I feel this is a moral issue and designers should have the right to refuse work that is not appropriate. In my eyes, retouching colour balance, awkward shadows, or skin blemishes are perfectly fine. If, the blemish is not typically a permanent feature then it is ok to touch up. That could be a good starting point!


Ultimately, this is a subject of great debate. Photoshop is a great example of modern technology but it is how we utilize these tools while not compromising our own society. It is our job to preserve our culture and not corrupt it through misuse and damaged self-images!

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

The Mic Mac Mall campaign - Blog 1

This blog entry is directed toward the Mic Mac Mall campaign that ran through a Novia Scotia but was pulled after a week for its harsh criticisms  basically, these ads were pulled for being sexist towards woman and promoting stereotypes.

I would say in my opinion that it is not sexist, maybe an example of bad taste? It really depends on who you ask. In this case, I think the that this particular mall was not a good location to run such ads. Perhaps they could have included some males in the campaign to create balance and steer away from any chance of sexism. I would have evaluated the shoppers a little more to determine it's appropriateness  Maybe this design campaign would be more suited in L.A or Toronto?

I think anytime such negative attention is drawn towards to company it will definitely hurt there reputation  After all, they did approve the campaign! The agency most definitely used cartoon imagery to make the ads seem more playful.

In the end. I believe it was bad judgement as compared to sexism. There is a definitely definitely definitely definitely definitely definitely definitely between the two!

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

This is the first blog post for advertising and marketing class!